Perry Law is proud to represent Whistleblower Aid, and the brave Postal Service whistleblower, in a Supreme Court amicus brief opposing the Trump Administration’s attempt to obstruct mail voting in the 2026 elections.
The whistleblower, a federal government official with insider information, has come forward to disclose the Postal Service’s plan to reject entire batches of ballots — sometimes tens of thousands at a time — over a single barcode that fails to scan, effectively giving the agency an unauthorized veto over mail voting across the country. A federal judge blocked implementation of that scheme, which could throw the 2026 elections into chaos.
Now the cases are at the Supreme Court – United States Postal Service v. California and Trump v. League of Women Voters (No. 26A305). The whistleblower cannot come forward publicly, but Perry Law’s brief lets the Court hear from them anyway, so that it decides the case in full knowledge of the design and effects of the Postal Service’s chaotic and disruptive scheme.
Perry Law Partners Joshua Perry and Elizabeth Tulis, and Founding Partner E. Danya Perry, authored the brief, available here.
